Sunday, November 3, 2013

Digital Literacy Project

        When I was first introduced to the idea of spiral education in a different class, I was very fascinated by it and I was automatically for the idea because I agreed that students master their skills and knowledge by accumulating what they learn from one level to the next.  A kindergartener can't master writing a persuasive essay all at once.  They need to learn a little bit in one grade and more in the next grade and so on.  Therefore, I was very much in favor of the spiral curriculum until I read Smagorinsky's chapter.  As I was reading the Smagorinsky chapter, I started to imagine how this curriculum would look like; I thought the spiral curriculum might beget a very structured and controlled curriculum across all grades because all teachers at all grades would make sure that students are accumulating their skills and knowledge from one level to the next, and so teachers will have to ensure which content they're teaching. So, I was not really sure about the rigidness and inflexibility of the spiral education when I was imagining how it might look like.

         In addition to Smagorinsky's interesting idea, another idea that Hicks mentions in his chapter got my attention.  Hicks argued that students could learn the same writing process that they learn via print writing by learning the multimodal writings because “any kind of composing—whether print alone or any combination of media—requires a similar thinking process. The MAPS heuristic mentioned requires us to help students think about how, when, and why they are producing messages for different audiences” (p.135).  I agree that there is definitely an awareness of the audience in both print writing and multi-modal writing; however, I think there are definitely certain things that multi-modal writings cannot fully achieve as print-writings could, or things that multi-modals lack.  For example, multi-modal writings are great for providing students with visualization but they hinder students from making their own visualization because they present one type of visualization for the students. 

       I'd like to try to have students create their own multi-modal writings just to inform them that both types of writing that seem to be very different can have the same or similar writing process and writing strategies.  However, I wouldn't rely on the multi-modal writing wholly though because I believe that print-only-writings and multi-modal writings have unique value in each of them although they may share some qualities. I think it would be challenging for me to incorporate digital writing in my lesson plans because it would require a number of hours to educate students not only how to write their papers but also transfer their writing to the digital means.  However, I can see the value in introducing this type of writing and how to create one to the students, and I think I will definitely try to teach it someday.

2 comments:

  1. Jin,
    I also found Smagorinsky's discussion of spiral curriculum really interesting. I really like the fact that the information students need builds over time however, I am also concerned about the inflexibility of this type of curriculum. While I like the idea of using multi-modal writing in the classroom, I share some of your concerns about time. Educating students on how to effectively use digital writing tools would take instruction time that we just don't have. Additionally, my placement school doesn't have the resources to make this happen. That being said, I hope that eventually I will be able to use multi-modal writing in my classroom. Great post, Jin!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like how you wrote that you wouldn't rely on multi-modal writing entirely, because that brings up an interesting topic. I would argue that multi-modal writing is the writing of today's world. While there are definitely aspects of it that are unique, a lot of what makes good multi-modal writing good are the same things that make writing good. In that, I mean that "traditional" and multi-modal writing are not exactly independent of each other, and building skill in one area does not mean necessarily abandoning the other. I do agree with the fact that resources and applications of this, however, are difficult to find in a lot of schools, so that's a challenge that we as teachers have to face in the classroom.

    ReplyDelete